Generating Argumentative Judgment Determiners
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a procedure to generate judgment determiners, e.g., many, few. Although such determiners carry very little objective information , they are extensively used in everyday language. The paper presents a precise characterization of a class of such determiners using three semantic tests. A conceptual representation for sets is then derived from this characterization which can serve as an input to a generator capable of producing judgment determiners. In a second part, a set of syntactic features controlling the realization of complex determiner sequences is presented. The mapping from the conceptual input to this set of syntactic features is then presented. The presented procedure relies on a description of the speaker's argumentative intent to control this mapping and to select appropriate judgment de-terminers.
منابع مشابه
Generating Argument at ive J ent eterminers
This paper presents a procedure to generate judgment determiners, e.g., many, few. Although such determiners carry very little objective information, they are extensively used in everyday language. The paper presents a precise characterization of a class of such determiners using three semantic tests. A conceptual representation for sets is then derived from this characterization which can serv...
متن کاملUsing Argumentation to Control Lexical Choice: A Functional Unification Implementation
Using Argumentation to Control Lexical Choice: A Functional Unification Implementation Michael Elhadad This thesis investigates the impact of the pragmatic situation on surface generation. It presents new surface generation techniques that improve on both aspects of surface generation: (1) lexical choice, which consists of choosing words and their associated syntactic structures and (2) syntact...
متن کاملGenerating Determiners and Quanti ers in Hebrew
This paper presents a speciic part of HUGG, a generation grammar for Hebrew. This part deals with determiners and quantiiers. Our main goal is to determine which set of features must be present in the input to the generation grammar to control the generation of complex determiners and quantiiers. Hebrew determiners are characterized by two properties: (1) deeniteness is marked in several places...
متن کاملA Corpus of Deep Argumentative Structures as an Explanation to Argumentative Relations
In this paper, we compose a new task for deep argumentative structure analysis that goes beyond shallow discourse structure analysis. The idea is that argumentative relations can reasonably be represented with a small set of predefined patterns. For example, using value judgment and bipolar causality, we can explain a support relation between two argumentative segments as follows: Segment 1 sta...
متن کاملProbabilistic abstract argumentation: an investigation with Boltzmann machines
Probabilistic argumentation and neuro-argumentative systems offer new computational perspectives for the theory and applications of argumentation, but their principled construction involve two entangled problems. On the one hand, probabilistic argumentation aims at combining the quantitative uncertainty addressed by probability theory with the qualitative uncertainty of argumentation, but proba...
متن کامل